Skillset can help you prepare! Sign up for your free Skillset account and take the first steps towards your certification.
Which of these rules must be satisfied before evidence is allowed to be presented in court.
Evidence must be competent
All of these
Evidence must be relevant
Evidence must be material
Thanks for the edits...helps us all...this is a good questions and answer now...You're saying that to be admissible in court, evidence must be admissible in court? This question needs to be rewritten. << AGREED... very confusing. Edited the question and answer, original answer is wrong unless you change the rest of them. Evidence must be relevant, material and competent, not sure where complete comes from, evidence can still be collected after a hearing begins (and in some cases ends) CISSP 7th Edition pgs 807-808 There are three basic requirements for evidence to be introduced into a court of law. To be considered admissible evidence , it must meet all three of these requirements, as determined by the judge, prior to being discussed in open court: ■ The evidence must be relevant t to determining a fact. Investigations 807 ■ The fact that the evidence seeks to determine must be material l (that is, related) to the case. ■ The evidence must be competent , meaning it must have been obtained legally. Evidence that results from an illegal search would be inadmissible because it is not competent.
Train with Skillset and pass your certification exam. Faster. Guaranteed.
Study thousands of practice questions that organized by skills and ranked by difficulty.
Create a tailored training plan based on the knowledge you already possess.
Know when you’re ready for the high-stakes exam. Have the confidence that you will pass on your first attempt.